Most motoring offences result in a fine and points. Dangerous Driving is different. It is a crime that can result in a prison sentence. Under Section 2 of the Road Traffic Act 1988, you are guilty of dangerous driving if your driving falls "far below" the standard of a competent and careful driver, and it would be "obvious" to a compe
The "Strict Liability" Trap: Defending the Indefensible Charge of Driving Without Insurance
Driving Without Insurance (Section 143 RTA 1988) is a "strict liability" offence. This means your intent does not matter. The court does not care if you thought you were insured. It does not care if it was an honest mistake. If you were driving a vehicle on a road and no valid policy was in force, you are guilty. The penalty is s
The "Strict Liability" Trap: Defending the Indefensible Charge of Driving Without Insurance
Driving Without Insurance (Section 143 RTA 1988) is a "strict liability" offence. This means your intent does not matter. The court does not care if you thought you were insured. It does not care if it was an honest mistake. If you were driving a vehicle on a road and no valid policy was in force, you are guilty. The penalty is s
The "Strict Liability" Trap: Defending the Indefensible Charge of Driving Without Insurance
Driving Without Insurance (Section 143 RTA 1988) is a "strict liability" offence. This means your intent does not matter. The court does not care if you thought you were insured. It does not care if it was an honest mistake. If you were driving a vehicle on a road and no valid policy was in force, you are guilty. The penalty is s
Beyond the Law: How Top Drink Driving Solicitors Win Cases on the Science
In a drink driving prosecution, the entire case against you rests on a single, crucial piece of evidence: a number. This number—the reading from an evidential breathalyser or the result of a blood or urine analysis—can seem like an irrefutable scientific fact. However, this "fact" is the end product of a complex chain of technol